In order to remove off the security alert in Access 2010/2013/2016, you must try out the below-mentioned fixes.
To fix this issue, many of you use the Access Runtimewhich makes it even harder to create or add trusted locations. In such cases, the security message appears by default to alert you about the problem. Suppose, the document might contain a signed or unsigned macro with an invalid signature. The message bar throws security alerts when there is potentially unsafe, active content in the documents you open. Following here is the screenshot of the error: One very common grip among MS Access 2007/2010/ 2013/2016 users is the security warning which pop-ups every time when they open a database from an untrusted location. You will have to “learn” ssma, but it works rather well.Īnd for other readers – the bit size/version of SQL server don’t matter, but the client SSMA and Access runtime (or ACE database engine) installed must match "bit" wise.Fix Access Errors What Is Access Security Warnings?
ACCESS RUNTIME 2010 PROBLEMS INSTALL
So try SSMA (latest version choose x86(x32), and then install access 2010 runtime (x32). The “issue” is that often most use+select ssma 圆4, but the vast majority of Access installs are x32 – and now you have to run down this “confusing” path (and I fully admit it is!!!). The connective install is faster and lighter, but x32Ģ010 runtime likely should also work fine here. And then install ACE connectively, or the 2010 access runtime (x32). I suggest downloading + using the x32 bit version. So just keep in mind that an x32 and 圆4 bit version of ssma 7.8 exists. There are “other” ways, but this would be about the most simple. And if it still complains, then you can install access 2010 runtime. If you install the latest version of ssma, you likely want to use the x86 version. If you using office 2016 圆4, then you need to use the 2016 圆4 Access runtime. Take a close look at the message – it likely not about CTR anymore, but about the bit size (you have to match the x32 runtime with office x32 and So the 2016 runtime should install just fine if indeed they removed CTR and are using the MSI install. The “issue” however is you can’t mix the same office CTR and MSI versions.Īnd you can't mix x32 office and 圆4 office for the same version also! And this is way most have done for 20 years of office installs. So no confusing – it is in most cases wise to install the same version of Access (or runtime) on your given machine. So the right move was to un-install CTR, install the MSI version, and that should allowed you to install 2016 runtime. (check this - the error message for installing should be different).
The only reason I can cook up that would prevent the 2016 runtime is they installed the 圆4 bit version of office and you attempting to install the x32 bit runtime. If office 2016 CTR was un-installed, and they dumped CTR and used the MSI version, then the 2016 runtime IS your best choice, makes the most sense and should have worked. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place. We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. In addition, your original issue is related with installing Access 2016 runtime, if you have any other issues like differences between Office 2013 and Office 2016 which is not related with developing, I suggest you post new threads in the forum below: I think Access 2010 runtime would not work for Access 2016, I suggest you use Access 2013 runtime as my above link indicated. > How much different would using the 2010 run-time for Office 2016 users be? In my above reply, it means functions are same between Access 2013 runtime and Access 2016 runtime instead of Access 2013 database and Access 2016 database. Will users be able to see any difference in the interface between 20? I know 2013 looks a lot different from 2010, but does 2016 pretty much look the same as 2013?